#HxA2025 Registration now open! Attend the conference where open minds meet.

NYC June 23-25, 2025 | Register before June 16

Register
Heterodox Academy
Back to Podcasts
Julie Wronski
October 15, 2018

Episode 36: Julie Wronski, How Authoritarianism Divides the Democratic Party

Show Notes

In today’s episode, Chris talks to Julie Wronski, professor of political science at the University of Mississippi. In a new paper, she and her coauthors show a difference between the average authoritarianism of Bernie Sanders voters and Hillary Clinton voters. Most of us know how to identify authoritarian leaders, but in today’s interview Julie explains how to define authoritarianism among voters, and why her findings matter to people outside political science. Timeline 0:00 Intro 3:05 Why do people associate authoritarianism with conservatives? 6:00 Why is authoritarianism dividing parties now? 13:00 Bob Altemeyer’s method of measuring authoritarianism 17:10 The right-wing measure vs. child-rearing measure of authoritarianism 25:18 Why is this relevant to other academics? Article
Wronski, Julie et al. (2018). “A Tale of Two Democrats: How Authoritarianism Divides the Democratic Party.”  Journal of Politics 80(4): 1384- 1388.
Books
Altemeyer, Enemies of Freedom Stenner, The Authoritarian Dynamic Heatherington & Weiler, Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics; Heatherington & Weiler, Prius or Pickup: How the Answers to Four Simple Questions Explain America’s Great Divide
  See the full list of episodes of Half Hour of Heterodoxy >>

Transcript

This is a transcript of this episode.
Share:

Get HxA In Your Inbox

Related Podcasts
Screenshot 2025 04 07 at 5 20 06 PM
S2 Episode 33: Trump vs. Academia: Inside the Battle Over Campus Speech
April 8, 2025+Joe Cohn
+Viewpoint Diversity+Constructive Disagreement+Open Inquiry+Institutional Neutrality
Screenshot 2025 03 17 at 9 05 23 PM
S2 Episode 32: Confronting Anti-Semitism in Higher Education With Cary Nelson
March 18, 2025+Cary Nelson
+Viewpoint Diversity+Constructive Disagreement+Open Inquiry
Hx A June8215of246
Make a Donation

Your generosity supports our non-partisan efforts to advance the principles of open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement to improve higher education and academic research.

This site use cookies.

To better improve your site experience, we collect some data. To see what types of information we collect, read our Cookie Policy.